![]() |
|
|
|
Liability Relief: A Corporate Perspective (Part 3) By Chris Olson Parts 1 and 2 of this series focused on the wide spectrum of sites commonly referred to as brownfields and the regulatory strings and re-openers that commonly accompany most No Further Action (NFA) determinations. In this final segment, we’ll look at some ideas and potential solutions that might help clear the way for more corporate brownfield properties to flow into the market and hopefully onto newly productive uses. Taking Brownfields to the Next Level RCRA today, despite a few hints of reform, remains a very prescriptive process. Comparisons have been made between RCRA and the Eagles’ 1976 song “Hotel California,” where the lyrics say “…You can check in anytime you like, but you can never leave.” It conjures up thoughts about the 30-year post-closure care requirement on RCRA regulated units. Superfund is not much better off and major reform seems to always be that mirage just ahead on the highway. One can’t argue with the overall goals of Superfund and the intent of protecting human health and the environment, but the program remains widely criticized for inefficiency, excessive costs, funding inequities, and promoting unnecessary litigation. Assuming that these programs require more difficult, long term “fixes,” let’s instead turn attention to four areas that could deliver some short-term results. 1. Begin with the End in Mind |
|
Brownfield News is the official publication of the National
Brownfield Association |
© 2006 Environomics Communications. 5440 North Cumberland Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60656
|